For the past year, KAPS/IAKA and animal
friends from around world have been lobbying the
Korean government to not adopt a draft law which
would recognize two classes of animal – pets and
livestock.
Dogs and cats would not be excepted from
their definition and would therefore be “raised”
as livestock for human consumption. KAPS has
argued that dogs and cats need to be a special
category, recognizing their longstanding role as
companion animals, that could not be raised as
livestock.
Nevertheless, the Korean government appears
to be determined to adopt the new law and has set
in motion a process that could result in it being
approves by the Korean National Assembly in July
2004.
This, of course,
is terrible news. If this
law passes as planned, only dogs and cats raised
explicitly as pets will be protected. Not only
does this mean that dogs and cats raised for human
consumption will have no protection from abuse
whatsoever but it also allows for any dog abuser
to get away with torturing these animals, legally,
just as long as he claims the animal is not a
pet.
We are asking you to send as many protest
letters as possible to Korean President and the
Ministry of Agriculture. This
matter is most urgent, as the Korean government
has already set up a time-line for the
introduction of this new law: the law will be
drafted and then sent to Korean Animal related
organizations for review in February 2004, before
being passed on to National Assembly. Please
write protest letters in both email and regular
mail and encourage others to do so, too. (President
Roh Moo-Hyun does not have an email address. If you try
emailing the Minister of Agriculture and the
message does not go through, please consider
sending a letter through the mail instead. AN .80˘
STAMP IS REQUIRED FOR LETTERS MAILED FROM THE U.S.
TO KOREA.)
Animal Protection Law amendment
schedule
* Consult related
organizations and draw up Amendment: February,
2004
* Consult related departments and notify
the public legislation in advance: March to
April, 2004
* Amendment
examination by Regulation Inspection Committee:
May to June, 2004
* Parliament submission:
July, 2004
* Legislation: August to December,
2004
* Enforcement: January, 2005
Send protest letters to:
President Roh
Moo-Hyun
Blue House
1 Sejong-Ro, Jongno-gu
Seoul
South Korea, 110-050
Minister Huh Sang-man
The Ministry of Agriculture
1 Jungang-dong, Gwacheon
Gyeonggi Prov.
South Korea, 427-760
-or-
wmaster@maf.go.kr
Sample letter to President
Roh, Moo-Hyun:
Dear President Roh, Moo-Hyun,
I am appalled to learn the Korean
Government is currently drafting an amendment to
the Animal Protection Law of 1991, making a
distinction between certain breeds of dogs as
meat-producing livestock animals and other breeds
as pets. In the draft law, the definition of pet
animal is an attempt to give legitimacy to dog and
cat meat.
The dogs and cats are protected only if
people raised them purposely as pet animal. This
means that any dog or cat purposely raised for
food will not be protected. Not only does this
deprive protection to animals who are raised for
food or medicine but will also result in a
situation where the law cannot punish any animal
abuser who claims that their dog or cat was raised
for any purposes other than pets. In 1991
your own government acknowledged that all dogs,
not just certain breeds, were entitled to
protection from cruelty, mistreatment, and
abuse.
Any amendment leaving dogs and cats
purposely bred for food or medicine without
protection would be a grave injustice and a major
setback for the animal protection efforts in
Korea.
If this new law passes, it would make Korea
the first and only country in the entire world to
explicitly legitimize dog meat, legally
sanctioning dog and cat killing for human
consumption. This would bring a great mark of
shame to your country, especially when the
overwhelming majority of the rest of the world has
banned dog-meat, including Taiwan, Thailand and
the Philippines. In fact,
Taiwan has recently strengthened their law to ban
the killing and selling dogs as food. Almost every
other country in the world, especially those as
developed as Korea, is moving forward with animal
protection laws. Why do you
want to embarrass your country and let it be known
as the only country taking a step
backwards?
Our boycott of Korea’s bid for the 2010
Olympic Winter Games was successful. After
choosing Vancouver, Canada, as the host city, the
International Olympic Committee sent letters to
International Aid for Korean Animals and The Korea
Animal Protection Society asking them and their
supporters to stop bombarding their offices with
protest cards. I promise
that if the proposed amendment to the Animal
Protection Law of 1991 passes, we will do
everything in our power to se that Korea will
loose all of its bids to host any major event,
including all international sporting events and
World Expositions. I, and my
many animal loving friends from around world, will
send protest letter after protest letter informing
the organizers of such events as to the horrors
that take place inside Korea, letting them know
that they should reconsider before choosing Korea
as a host city.
All Dog and Cat are companion pet animals
and should not be raised for human
consumption.
Yours sincerely
Name/Country